Democracy, Corruption, and Governance Reform


Restore Executive Order Boundaries

Executive orders were meant to clarify how the executive branch enforces existing law—not to invent new laws outright. But decades of abuse by both parties have turned them into tools of backdoor policymaking, bypassing Congress and concentrating power where it doesn't belong.

Transparency and Public Justification

Any executive order should require a clear legal rationale and impact statement at the time of issuance. The Brennan Center for Justice argues that transparency is essential to accountability and democratic legitimacy. Orders issued without clear statutory grounding or public explanation should be subject to immediate challenge.

Strengthen Congressional Oversight Mechanisms

Congress must have the tools, staff, and authority to review executive actions effectively. The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) outlines how congressional oversight—when properly resourced and enforced—acts as a critical check on executive overreach. Formal review windows for executive orders with significant budgetary or policy impacts would help restore legislative control.

Expand Judicial Review of Executive Orders

Unchecked executive orders often escape judicial scrutiny entirely or are given undue deference. The Cato Institute calls for stronger judicial willingness to review executive actions on their merits, not just on procedural grounds. Courts must be empowered and expected to challenge orders that stretch or distort statutory intent.


Healthcare


Civil Rights, Trans Rights, and LGBTQ+ Policy


Economics & Working-Class Policy


Abortion & Bodily Autonomy


Immigration


Anti-Authoritarianism


Human Rights & International Accountability


Foreign Policy


Public Safety


Education & Critical Capacity


Climate and Environment


Technology and AI


Criminal Justice Reform


Rural Policy and Broadband


Disability Rights and Accessibility